Source: https://www.cpr.org, July 31, 2019
By: Dan Boyce
There’s nothing particularly unusual about the field of recently harvested alfalfa at Venetucci Farm except that for many decades it was a pumpkin patch. The Venetucci family used to grow pumpkins here to give away to Colorado Springs children on Halloween.
When the Pikes Peak Community Foundation took over the farm in 2006, they continued the tradition and ran a small nonprofit organic vegetable farm — until they were blindsided by contamination traced to nearby Peterson Air Force Base.
“Nobody really understood what the firefighting foam was,” said Sam Clark, the foundation’s director of philanthropy.
The U.S. Air Force has spent hundreds of millions to clean up contamination from the toxic firefighting foam used for training exercises on bases across the country. The foam contains some of a family of compounds broadly known as PFAS chemicals. PFAS have long been found in applications from coating nonstick cookware and stain-resistant fabrics to the firefighting foam, which has been used across industries for its track record of efficiently extinguishing petroleum-based fires.
The Environmental Protection Agency issued a health advisory in 2016 that warned of the connection between PFAS and certain types of cancer.
After the advisory and the discovery of widespread groundwater and soil contamination near Peterson Airforce Base, the Pikes Peak Community Foundation shut down organic vegetable production at the Venetucci farm. They opted to instead raise lower-priced feedstock for horses.
It’s one example of the financial burden this region still bears from the pollution, despite the $50 million the Air Force has spent on cleanup around Peterson.
“There are 60,000 stories just like this and they’re happening at the kitchen sink in every Fountain, Widefield and Security home,” Clark said of the communities whose water was tainted by the foam.
The foundation, as well as the nearby Security Water District, have sued the Air Force over the chemicals. District general manager Roy Heald said they had to find a new source of water for their customers, a complicated process which involved the construction of a mile-long pipeline to buy water from Colorado Springs. The cost of the pipeline and the first two years of water set the district back $6 million.
“There was no blue light special on those costs,” Heald deadpanned.
In 2018, the Air Force stepped in to cover the district’s water costs until the construction of a new treatment facility was completed. The Air Force will also pay for the facility. Still, Heald said it’s unclear what the ongoing long-term costs will be for the district when it comes to the new facility. It will be needed as long as the contamination remains in the groundwater, which could essentially be forever.
“Maybe a couple of weeks less than forever, I don’t know,” Heald lamented.
As of this June, $357 million has been spent on PFAS cleanup around 22 Air Force installations nationwide. It’s a lot of money that many who live near the sites say barely touches on the full problem.
The PFAS levels found in Liz Rosenbaum’s water district are just under what the EPA deems as hazardous. Rosenbaum lives about 30 miles from Peterson and the Air Force isn’t doing any cleanup here. She doesn’t drink from her tap and spends about $70 per month to have drinking water delivered.
“I don’t want to die of kidney cancer, you know?” she said.
There’s disagreement even between government agencies about what concentration of PFAS is safe for humans. A division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that levelsshould be set seven to 10 times lower than the EPA’s health advisory.
Genna Reed, the lead PFAS researcher for the Union of Concerned Scientists, has said the Department of Defense “misrepresented the scope of this issue in order to avoid having to pay.”
The Air Force would not grant an interview for this story, but states on the PFAS website it established that “protecting human health is our priority.”
Reed said the Department of Defense has limited which PFAS chemicals it tests for in groundwater and only releases data when the results are above the higher EPA threshold.
“Community members who have been exposed to this chemical and were not told of its release are being the ones left with the burden of paying for this contamination and paying to find out how much is in their water and also to find out how much is in their blood,” Reed said.
Rosenbaum said the full blood panel to test for PFAS chemicals costs about $700 — out of reach for many living near Peterson AFB.
Rosenbaum has organized a local clean water coalition to go after grants to test residents’ blood and water. She’s frustrated they have to do that work themselves.
“There’s absolutely no reason for our communities to go into debt over another water contamination that we didn’t cause,” she said.